Tuesday, November 8, 2016

B.A 497 U/S 9-B CNSA



IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS JUDGE DADU
                    Bail Application No.         of 2011
Jameel  S/o Mohammad Moosa
By caste Lakhair R/o village Jumo
Lakhair Taluka Mehar District Dadu
Now confined in District Jail Dadu……...…Applicant/accused.
                            V E R S U S
The State………………………..…..Opponent.
Crime No.11/2011
P.S      Nau Goth
U/S   9-B CNSA.              
                                                         
             BAIL APPLICATION U/S 497 Cr.P.C

             It is humbly prayed on behalf of the above named Applicant/accused that this Honorable Court may be pleased to grant him bail in the above cited crime and offences pending investigation on consideration of following facts and grounds :-
FACTS. 
              The brief facts of case are that complainant ASI Mohammad Hashim Magsi lodged FIR with PS Nau Goth on behalf of the state alleging therein that he is posted as ASI at PS Nau Goth, on 16.07.2011 he received spy information that one person was selling Charas at Datsun stop of Dargah Makhdoom Saeedi Moosani. As such the complainant  alongwith his subordinate staff left P.S vide entry No. 18 at 0730 hours and proceeded towards pointed place. It was about 0750 hours, when the complainant party reached at Datsun stop of Makhdoom Saeedi Moosani and saw that one accused person having seen police party in uniform tried to fled away but the complainant party encircled him and captured him with strategy. The accused person was inquired about his name and whereabouts to which he disclosed his name to be Jameel S/o Mohammad Moosa Lakhair R/o Jumo Lakhair Taluka Mehar. The complainant conducted his body search and recovered one plastic bag containing one big and 10 short pieces of charas and cash Rs.200. the complainant got the charas wheighed which became 250 grams out of which 10 grams were separated for chemical examination while the 140 garms was separately sealed. He further alleged that the accused person further disclosed that he is selling Charas at Dargah since long. Such mashirnama was prepared by the complainant with signatures of C Aziz Ahmed and C Manzoor Ahmed. Thereafter the complainant returned back to PS alongwith arrested accused person and recovered property and lodged FIR to this effect.
                        Police after registering FIR obtained remand and the accused has been sent to jail in judicial custody, hence this bail application.

GROUNDS.

1.     That the applicant/accused is innocent and the alleged offence has not been committed by him at all.

2.     That applicant/accused has been dragged in this false, managed and concocted case by the complainant with malafide intention and ulterior motives in order to show his efficiency.

3.     That although the complainant had prior information, but he did not associate any private person to act as mashir, which is clear violation of section 103 CrPC.

4.     That the PWs are police officials and subordinate of the complainant hence are setup, inimical and hostile towards applicants/accused.

5.     That the alleged recovered charas and cash have been foisted upon applicant/accused.

6.     That according to the contents of FIR, a quantity of 250 grams of charas was recovered, which were in one big piece and 10 short pieces but FIR is silent as to from which piece 10 grams were separated for chemical examination, which makes the case of prosecution highly doubtful.

7.     That it is also not mentioned in the FIR that wherefrom the recovered charas got weighed, which also makes the prosecution doubtful.

8.     That the alleged offences do not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497 Cr.P.C.

9.     That in the above circumstances the case of applicants/accused requires further inquiry.

10.                  That the Applicant/accused is not likely to abscond or temper with the prosecution.

11.                   That the applicant/accused are prepared to furnish solvent surety to the satisfaction of this Honorable Court.

12.                   That other and more points will be argued at the time of hearing of this bail application with the permission of this honorable court.

13.                   That the prayer is made in the interest of justice.

Dadu.
Dated.                                                            Advocate

                                                         For the applicant/accused 

B.A 497 U/S324,353,399,401 PPC.





IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS JUDGE DADU
            S. Case No.                          of 2010
                      Bail Application No.           of 2011

Altaf  S/o Mohammad Khan by
Caste Jamali R/o village Uris Jamali
Near Allah Bachaio Jamali Taluka Johi
District Dadu, Now confined in District
Jail  Dadu …………….………………...…...……Applicant/accused.
                            V E R S U S
The State…………………………..…..Opponent.
                           
Crime No.  196  of     2010
P.S         Rukkan
U/S324,353,399,401 PPC.              
                                                         
             BAIL APPLICATION U/S 497 Cr.P.C

             It is humbly prayed on behalf of the above named Applicant/accused that this Honorable Court may be pleased to grant him bail in the above cited crime and offences pending trial before this honorable court, on consideration of following facts and grounds :-

FACTS.

               The brief facts of case are that on 27.12.2010  at 1900 hours complainant Inspector Ghulam Abbass Babar lodged FIR with PS Rukkan on behalf of the state, alleging therein that he is posted as S.H.O at PS Rukkan. On 27.12.2010 he alongwith his subordinate staff left P.S on a private vehicle, vide D.D entry No. 14 at 1730 hours for patrolling of area and during patrolling, when they reached at link road Paat to Dubi near Dargah Pir Haji Ismail, they saw that four armed persons came onto the road from eastern side, who were identified on the head light of vehicle to be 1) Ashique Birhamani armed with SBBL gun 2) Ghaffar Chandio with gun 3)Mour @ Mouroo with repeater 4)Altaf Jamali with pistol, who considering to be a private vehicle signaled the complainant party to stop with intention to rob them. The complainant party at once stopped vehicle and got down. Having seen the complainant party in uniform the accused persons opened straight fires towards complainant party intending to commit their murder. As such complainant party got positioned and made fires in their defense and with strategy proceeded towards them. This encounter last for about 10 minutes and then firing from accused side stopped and one accused person surrendered who was captured by the complainant while three accused persons taking advantage of darkness made their escape good towards east. Complainant party took the gun of the captured accused into custody, checked it and found it in working condition. The accused was inquired about his name and whereabouts to which he disclosed his name as Ashique S/o Ghulam Nabi Birhamani. About gun he disclosed that it was un-licensed. The complainant conducted body search of the accused and found nothing. The complainant asked the accused about escaped accused persons to which he disclosed their names to be Ghaffar Chandio, Mour @ Mouroo Chandio and Altaf Jamali. Such mashirnama of arrest and recovery was prepared by the complainant with signatures of HC Dildar Ali and PC Mohammad Bachal on head light of vehicle. Thereafter the complainant party brought accused and property at PS and he lodged FIR to this effect.

                        Police after usual investigation submitted challan showing the accused/applicant as absconder. Subsequently he was arrested and now is confined in District Jail Dadu, hence this bail application.

GROUNDS.

1.     That the applicant/accused is innocent and the alleged offence has not been committed by them at all.

2.     That applicant/accused has been dragged in this false, managed and concocted case by the complainant with malafide intention and ulterior motives.

3.     That the case is of ineffective firing.

4.     That the alleged encounter has continued for 10 minutes but surprisingly none from either side has received any single injury or scratch, even the bullets did not hit the parked vehicle.

5.     That there are general allegations against the applicant/accused and no specific role is attributed to him in commission of the alleged offence.

6.     That the investigation has already been completed and challan has been submitted therefore more detention of the applicant/accused will serve no purpose.

7.     That the PWs are police officials and subordinate of the complainant hence are setup, inimical and hostile towards applicants/accused.

8.     That the alleged offences do not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497 Cr.P.C.

9.     That it is a night time incident and identification of the accused/applicant on head light of vehicle is the weakest piece of evidence.

10.                   That the applicant/accused was all along present at his   village and was un-aware about his implication in this  false and concocted case but he was malafidely shown as  absconder.

11.                   That the Applicant/accused is not likely to abscond or temper with the prosecution if admitted to bail.

12.                   That the applicant/accused is prepared to furnish solvent surety to the satisfaction of this Honorable Court.

13.                   That other and more points will be argued at the time of hearing of this bail application with the permission of this honorable court.

14.                   That the prayer is made in the interest of justice.

Dadu.
Dated.                                                            Advocate

                                                         For the applicant/accused 

B.A 497 U/S. 365, 109 PPC



      
IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS JUDGE DADU
                               Bail Application No.         of 2011

Altaf S/o Mohammad by caste
Mureedani Jamali R/o village
Uris Jamali Taluka Johi District
Dadu, Now confined in District
Jail  Dadu …………….………...……………...…Applicant/accused.
                            V E R S U S
The State………………………………………………..…..Opponent.
                                            Crime No.96/11
P.S     Johi
U/S 365,109PPC.              
                                                         
             BAIL APPLICATION U/S 497 Cr.P.C

             It is humbly prayed on behalf of the above named Applicant/accused that this Honorable Court may be pleased to grant him bail in the above cited crime and offences pending trial on consideration of following facts and grounds :-

FACTS. 

              The brief facts of prosecution case are that on 23.07.2011 at 11300 hours complainant Badarudin Rahoojo lodged FIR with PS Johi alleging therein that he is veterinary doctor and has clinic at Chhandin Mori where he goes daily in the morning and about 07:00 pm in the evening he returns back. He also goes to different villages for treatment of cattle. Namely Bachal @ Nano Sekhani Jamali took the complainant to his village several times for treatment of cattle, but whenever the complainant demanded fees from him he used to say that if he demands money from him he will get the complainant kidnapped. The complainant also used to go to village Allah Bachayo where he has another veterinary clinic and used to go to nearby villages for treatment of cattle. On 21.06.2011 in the morning the complainant came at his clinic and at about 11:15 am he went to his clinic at village Allah Bachayo on his Road Prince motorcycle. When the complainant reached at village Allah Bachayo Jamali near Thadhri Peer graveyard at 11:30 am he saw that three accused persons were coming on a 125 motorcycle who were identified by the complainant to be 1)Altaf 2)Yameen both by caste Mureedani Jamali and 3)Ali Hassan Mastoi who having come near the complainant jammed his motorcycle, got down, took out pistols from their folds and said to the complainant that as to why he  demands money from their friend Bachal @ Nano Sekhani Jamali. He further alleged that accused Yameen and Altaf Jamali got on the complainant’s motorcycle and put their pistols at his back and made him drive the motorcycle while accused Ali Hassan was also following the complainant. As soon as they crossed “Band” the accused persons kidnapped him and brought him at village of Ali Hassan Mastoi and kept him there all the day. Today i-e 23.06.2011 the accused persons said to the complainant that his relatives has raided overthere through police and police was near to them. Therefore the accused persons brought the complainant at Band of Johi Branch and at about 06:00 pm in the evening returned his motorcycle and let him go. Thereafter the complainant came at Johi where he met his brothers namely Muneer Ahmed and Sadarudin to whom he narrated the facts and then he appeared at PS Johi and lodged FIR to this effect.

                    Police after usual investigation submitted challan and sent the applicant/accused to jail, hence this bail application.

GROUNDS.

1.     That the applicant/accused is innocent and the alleged offence has not been committed by him at all.

2.     That applicant/accused has been falsely implicated the applicant/accused in this case by the complainant with malafide intention and ulterior motives.

3.     That even alleged place of incident is a busy road  but there is no witness of the alleged incident and the complainant himself is the only witness of the incident which makes the case of prosecution highly doubtful and one of further inquiry.

4.     That there is delay of more than two days in lodging of FIR.

5.     That it is also incredible that the accused persons kidnapped the complainant alongwith his motorcycle but after two days voluntarily released him and also returned his motorcycle.

6.     That the applicant/accused has no concern with one Bachal @ Nano Jamali as he is Sekhani Jamali while the applicant/accused is Mureedani Jamali.

7.     That the alleged offences do not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497 Cr.P.C.

8.     That the Applicant/accused is not likely to abscond or temper with the prosecution evidence if admitted to bail.

9.      That the applicant/accused is prepared to furnish solvent surety to the satisfaction of this Honorable Court.

10.                   That other and more points will be argued at the time of hearing of this bail application with the permission of this honorable court.

11.                   That the prayer is made in the interest of justice.

Dadu.
Dated.                                                            Advocate
                                                         For the applicant/accused

     IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS JUDGE DADU
                               Bail Application No.         of 2011

Altaf Jamali…..……….………...……………...…Applicant/accused.
                            V E R S U S
The State………………………………………………..…..Opponent.
Crime No.96/11
P.S     Johi
U/S 365,109PPC.           
                                         AFFIDAVIT
             I                       S/o                              by caste           
  R/o                          Dadu do hereby state on oath as under:-

1.                       That I am complainant in the above case and am well conversant with the facts of this case.

2.                       That on 21.06.2011 some culprits kidnapped me as such I lodged FIR bearing crime No.96/2011 at PS Johi U/s 365,109 PPC.

3.                       That I have not given the name of applicant/accused Altaf Jamali in my FIR, as he is not my culprit as such I totally exonerate him from the commission of above offence.

4.                       That I have no objection if this honorable court may be pleased to grant bail to applicant/accused Altaf Jamali as he is innocent and police has dragged him in present case with their own accord.

5.                       That I am swearing this affidavit with my own accord, free will and without any force, pressure or consideration etc.

6.                       That what ever stated above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Dadu.
Dated.                                                           Deponent
                       I know the deponent


                          Advocate Dadu                                                 

B.A US.497 U/S 17/3H.O

IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS JUDGE DADU
     
            Session Case No.                         of 2010
           Criminal Bail Application No.     of 2010

1.     Waheed Ali S/o Muhammad
Soomar Solangi, minor R/o
Village Pachooha Taluka Dadu

2. Ghulam Asghar S/o Muhammad
    Meeral Brohi R/o Soorajabad
    Muhalla Dadu, Now confined in
   District Jail  Dadu……………...……Applicants/accused.

                            V E R S U S

The State………………………………..Opponent.

                                          Crime No. 550 of 2009
Police Station Dadu
U/S 17/3 H.O               .
                 
            CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION U/S 497 OF
          CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE 1898

           It is humbly and respectfully prayed on behalf of the above named applicants/accused that this honorable court may kindly be pleased to admit him on bail in the above mentioned crime and offences, pending trial before this Honorable Court on the consideration of the following facts and ground :-

FACTS.

             Complainant Syed Asif Ali Shah lodged FIR on 24.12.2009 at 1500 alleging therein that he owns Al-shahbaz Admore CNG Station on Indus High Way in Markhpoor Muhalla Dadu which he himself manage and usually he deposits cash in Allied Bank Dadu. It is alleged that on 17.12.2009 the complainant as usual, left his CNG Station for Allied Bank by putting cash of Rs.3,33040/= and a CNG Book in a bag by Motor Cycle when at about 11:00 AM the complainant reached towards northern side of police line Dadu on Road Near Alamdar Road, he was intercepted by four culprits who were armed with Pistols and asked to stop therefore the complainant due to fear stopped there and one culprit aimed his Pistol at complainant at some distance while the rest three culprits encircled the complainant, robbed the bag of cash and one culprit snatched the key of Motor Cycle when Syed Saleh Muhmmad Shah and Syed Altaf Husain Shah and so many other passers by also witnessed the incident. It is alleged that complainant identified two culprits namely Waheed Ali Solangi and Ghulam Asghar Brohi, where as the two will be identified if seen by him and the said Waheed Solangi and Asghar Brohi fled away with cash and two other ran away by Alamdar Road. It is further alleged that PWs Saleh Muhmmad Shah and Altaf Hussain Shah informed the complainant that they have also identified the accused Waheed Solangi and Ghulam Asghar Solangi. Thereafter the complainant gave such information at P.S Dadu but did not get register the case therefore the complainant lodged the FIR to this effect on 24.12.2009.

        Police started investigation, and arrested the applicants/accused and finally challaned the case hence this bail application.

GROUNDS

1.           That the applicants/accused are innocent and the alleged offences has not been committed by them at all.  They have been implicated in this false, managed and concocted case by the complainant with malafide intention and ulterior motive in connivance of Police of Dadu Police station.

2.           That accused Waheed Ali is a minor boy who was taken away by SHO Dadu and was kept  in wrongful confinement for about a weak before the alleged day of incident i.e 23.12.2009 therefore the relatives of  accused Waheed Ali were coming to Honorable Court for seeking justice in this respect but the police of P.S Dadu intercepted them and severely and mercilessly started firing upon the houses of the relatives of accused Waheed Ali as well as inflicted Danda blows to father of accused Waheed Ali, and seriously injured the other co-villagers of village Pachooha which illegal action and violence was telecasted by so many T.V Channels therefore the police in order to save their skin started lodging false series of FIRs bearing Crime No.545 of 2009, 542 of 2009, 543 of 2009 against the applicants/accused and his other forty relatives and the present FIR is one of those false FIRs, Therefore Mst.Noshad the cousin of accused Waheed Ali has filed an application U/S 22 Ab Cr.P.C against the said police officials of Dadu P.S and the Honorable Court was pleased to refer the injured relatives of accused Waheed Ali to Civil Surgeon Civil Hospital Dadu for examination, treatment and certificate who were examined by M.O and such Medico legal Certificates in respect of injuries have been issued.

3.           That there is delay of 7 days in lodging of the FIR and no cogent and satisfactory explanation has been furnished by the complainant.

4.           That the witnesses namely Syed Saleh Muhmmad Shah and Syed Altaf Hussain Shah are admittedly relatives of the complainant, who are setup and interested and there is no independent witness of the alleged incident though the alleged incident had taken place in thickly populated area of Dadu town and police line Dadu.

5.           That the FIR has been lodged by the complainant with consultation and deliberation after seven days of the alleged occurrence.

6.           That there are no reasonable grounds to believe that the applicants/accused are guilty of the alleged offences and the case is of further enquiry.

7.           That there is no recovery of the alleged stolen articles from the possession of the accused/applicants.

8.           That the applicants/accused are not likely to abscond or temper with the prosecution evidence.

9.           That other and more points will be argued at the time of hearing of this bail application with permission of this honorable court.

10.      That the applicants/accused are prepared to furnish solvent surety to the satisfaction of this honorable court.

11.      That the copy of FIR of present case, other three FIRs and application U/S 22 Ab Cr.P.C, Medical Certificates and Vakalatnama are submitted herewith.

12.       That the prayer is made in the interest of justice.

Dadu.
Dated. 04.01.2010


                                                                   Advocate
                                                     For the applicants/accused.


B.A 497 U/S 13D

IN THE COURT OF IIND CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M DADU

           Crl. Case No.                of 2016
            Bail Application No.     of 2016

Waheed Ali S/o Muhammad Soomar
Solangi R/o Village Pachooha Taluka
Dadu Muhalla Dadu, Now confined in
District Jail  Dadu………………….…...……Applicants/accused.

                            V E R S U S

The State…………………………………..…..Opponent.

                                          Crime No. 53 of 2014
Police Station Dadu
U/S 13-D.  A.O               .
                  
       CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION U/S 497 OF
    CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE 1898

                      It is humbly and respectfully prayed on behalf of the above named applicants/accused that this honorable court may kindly be pleased to admit him on bail in the above mentioned crime and offences, pending trial before this Honorable Court on the consideration of the following facts and ground :-

FACTS.

                Complainant ASI Ghulam Rasool Soomaro lodged FIR alleging therein that he had recovered a pistol of thirty bore along with magazine in crime No. 542 of 2014 U/S 324, 353, 148, 149, 411, 412 P.P.C from accused without license and such mashirnama of arrest and recovery was already prepared in presence of mashirs H.C Manzoor Ali Shah and P.C Abdul Hakeem therefore he lodged the FIR to this effect.

                            Police started investigation, and arrested the applicants/accused and finally challaned the case hence this bail application.
                  
GROUNDS

1.                 That the applicant/accused has been falsely implicated by the complainant.

2.                 That the applicant/accused was brought by  Dadu Police about a week ago and was kept in wrongful confinement and when the relatives including the father and others were coming to Honorable Court on 23.12.2009 when Dadu Police intercepted and started firing and injured so many villagers which photages was shown on various T.V channels therefore the police in order to save their skin file the false case of encounter and the present case of 13-D by foisting the case property upon the applicant/accused.

3.                 That the alleged offence do not fall within the prohibitory clause of Section 497 Cr.P.C.

4.                 That the applicant/accused is not likely to abscond or temper with the prosecution evidence.

5.                 That the applicant/accused is prepared to furnish solvent surety to the satisfaction of this Honorable Court.

6.                 That the Vakalatanama and copy of FIR are submitted herewith.

7.                 Prayer is made in the interest of justice.

Dadu.
Dated.         
                               
                                                                              Advocate

                                                                 For the applicant/accused.