Tuesday, November 8, 2016

B.A 497 U/S 9-B CNSA



IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS JUDGE DADU
                    Bail Application No.         of 2011
Jameel  S/o Mohammad Moosa
By caste Lakhair R/o village Jumo
Lakhair Taluka Mehar District Dadu
Now confined in District Jail Dadu……...…Applicant/accused.
                            V E R S U S
The State………………………..…..Opponent.
Crime No.11/2011
P.S      Nau Goth
U/S   9-B CNSA.              
                                                         
             BAIL APPLICATION U/S 497 Cr.P.C

             It is humbly prayed on behalf of the above named Applicant/accused that this Honorable Court may be pleased to grant him bail in the above cited crime and offences pending investigation on consideration of following facts and grounds :-
FACTS. 
              The brief facts of case are that complainant ASI Mohammad Hashim Magsi lodged FIR with PS Nau Goth on behalf of the state alleging therein that he is posted as ASI at PS Nau Goth, on 16.07.2011 he received spy information that one person was selling Charas at Datsun stop of Dargah Makhdoom Saeedi Moosani. As such the complainant  alongwith his subordinate staff left P.S vide entry No. 18 at 0730 hours and proceeded towards pointed place. It was about 0750 hours, when the complainant party reached at Datsun stop of Makhdoom Saeedi Moosani and saw that one accused person having seen police party in uniform tried to fled away but the complainant party encircled him and captured him with strategy. The accused person was inquired about his name and whereabouts to which he disclosed his name to be Jameel S/o Mohammad Moosa Lakhair R/o Jumo Lakhair Taluka Mehar. The complainant conducted his body search and recovered one plastic bag containing one big and 10 short pieces of charas and cash Rs.200. the complainant got the charas wheighed which became 250 grams out of which 10 grams were separated for chemical examination while the 140 garms was separately sealed. He further alleged that the accused person further disclosed that he is selling Charas at Dargah since long. Such mashirnama was prepared by the complainant with signatures of C Aziz Ahmed and C Manzoor Ahmed. Thereafter the complainant returned back to PS alongwith arrested accused person and recovered property and lodged FIR to this effect.
                        Police after registering FIR obtained remand and the accused has been sent to jail in judicial custody, hence this bail application.

GROUNDS.

1.     That the applicant/accused is innocent and the alleged offence has not been committed by him at all.

2.     That applicant/accused has been dragged in this false, managed and concocted case by the complainant with malafide intention and ulterior motives in order to show his efficiency.

3.     That although the complainant had prior information, but he did not associate any private person to act as mashir, which is clear violation of section 103 CrPC.

4.     That the PWs are police officials and subordinate of the complainant hence are setup, inimical and hostile towards applicants/accused.

5.     That the alleged recovered charas and cash have been foisted upon applicant/accused.

6.     That according to the contents of FIR, a quantity of 250 grams of charas was recovered, which were in one big piece and 10 short pieces but FIR is silent as to from which piece 10 grams were separated for chemical examination, which makes the case of prosecution highly doubtful.

7.     That it is also not mentioned in the FIR that wherefrom the recovered charas got weighed, which also makes the prosecution doubtful.

8.     That the alleged offences do not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497 Cr.P.C.

9.     That in the above circumstances the case of applicants/accused requires further inquiry.

10.                  That the Applicant/accused is not likely to abscond or temper with the prosecution.

11.                   That the applicant/accused are prepared to furnish solvent surety to the satisfaction of this Honorable Court.

12.                   That other and more points will be argued at the time of hearing of this bail application with the permission of this honorable court.

13.                   That the prayer is made in the interest of justice.

Dadu.
Dated.                                                            Advocate

                                                         For the applicant/accused 

No comments:

Post a Comment